Can an assessment of our buying habits be a peep into our state of mental well-being?
Institutional contexts present us with our best
opportunities for psychological growth. On the flip-side, it’s within institutions
that we may suffer the gravest of damage to our emotional health. Institutions embedded
with bureaucracies and hierarchies, where power plays are rife are places where
we are most susceptible to damage. Again, such places if navigated well, pose
enormous opportunities for emotional growth. When I say institutions, I include
the whole lot, meaning the family, places of worship where religion is practiced,
schools, colleges, business firms where we work, and so on. Of course, some of those
are places where we are subject to normative influences
and therefore have a greater power over our psychological makeup, like the family
for example.
It’s also important to note that as we rise up the hierarchy
in these institutions, our ability to either grow or inflict damage on others too
is enhanced.
To make an assessment of our emotional well-being, it would
help if we put under scrutiny our relationships within institutional contexts.
Now this is a two
way street. Meaning the state of our relationships with others within the family
and outside, at social and business institutions, will majorly impact our
mental state of being. Conversely, our psychological health will be the key to the
kind of relationships we foster in these places.
If the state of human relationship can be seen as a barometer
for psychological health, what about our relationships with products and brands
via acts of consumption? Studies have shown the two to be linked. A 1998 Rutgers study
whose purpose was to ‘examine the emotional, cognitive, and behavioural
influences of mania and depression on consumer behaviour’ found that the ‘mania-depression
continuum can account for several consumption phenomena previously thought to
be unrelated including risk-taking, sensation seeking, product involvement,
addiction, innovativeness, information search and hedonic consumption.’ This
correlation between mental health and consumption habits means the stuff we buy
and consume has much to do with how we feel about ourselves. Conversely, what
we buy and use in turn has an impact on our state of mind. Take content consumption
on the idiot box for example. What we pick and watch is an outcome of our
mental makeup (for example, happy people
watch less TV), and what we watch ends up fashioning
the attitudes we harbour.
A taking stock of our emotional state of being and doing something
about it is as important as our efforts to keep ourselves physiologically healthy.
When we do take such stock, a look at our buying habits may prove to be
invaluable in arriving at an assessment of our state of mental well-being.
Comments